iScience doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.117634
Caves EM, Davis AL, Nowicki S & Johnsen S. 2023. Backgrounds and the evolution of visual signals.Trends in Ecology and Evolution doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.09.006
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2023. Human-wild bird cooperation. Science doi:10.1126/science.adl5923
Searcy WA, Chronister LM & Nowicki S. 2023. Syntactic rules predict song type matching in a songbird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology doi:10.1007/s00265-022-03286-3
Peters S, Soha J, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2022. Are song sequencing rules learned by song sparrows? Animal Behaviour doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.07.015
Davis A, Zipple MN, Diaz D, Peters S, Nowicki S & Johnson S. 2022. Influence of visual background on discrimination of signal-relevant colours in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proceedings of the Royal Society B doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.0756
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2022. Animal communication. In: The Behavior of Animals: Mechanisms, Function and Evolution. J.J. Bolhuis et al. (eds.), Chapter 14. John Wiley & Sons.
Searcy WA, Soha J, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2022. Long-distance dependencies in birdsong syntax. Proceedings of the Royal Society B doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2473
Green PA, George EM, Rosvall KA, Johnsen S & Nowicki S. 2021. Testosterone, signal coloration, and signal color perception in male zebra finch contests. Ethology doi:10.1111/eth.13247
Kochvar KH, Peters S, Zipple MN & Nowicki S. 2021. Maturational changes in song sparrow song. Journal of Avian Biology doi:10.1111/jav.02872
Searcy WA, Soha J, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2021. Variation in vocal production learning across songbirds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B doi:10.1098/rtsb.2020.0257
Caves EM, Green PA, Zipple MN, Bharath D, Peters S, Johnsen S & Nowicki S. 2021. Comparison of categorial color perception in two Estrildid finches. American Naturalist doi:10.1086/712379
Zipple MN, Peters S, Searcy W & Nowicki S. 2020. Female swamp sparrows do not show evidence of discriminating between the songs of peak-aged and senescent males. Ethology doi:10.1111/eth.13102
Peniston JH, Green PA, Zipple MN & Nowicki S. 2020. Threshhold assessment, categorical perception, and the evolution of reliable signaling. Evolution doi:10.1111/evo.14122
Dinh, JP, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2020. Song performance improves with continued singing across the morning in a songbird. Animal Behaviour doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.06.018
Caves EM, Schweikert LE, Green PA, Zipple MN, Taboada C, Peters S, Nowicki S & Johnsen S. 2020. Variation in carotenoid-containing retinal oil droplets correlates with variation in perception of carotenoid coloration. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology doi:10.1007/s00265-020-02874-5
Green PA, Brandley NC & Nowicki S. 2020. Categorical perception in animal communication and decision-making. Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/araa004
Zipple MN, Peters S, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2020. Sounds of senescence: male swamp sparrows respond less aggressively to the songs of older individuals. Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/arz218
Searcy, WA & Nowicki S. 2019. The raised-by-wolves predicament. Curr. Biol. 29: R1243-1244. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.064
Soha JA, Peters S, Anderson RC, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2019. Performance on tests of cognitive ability is not repeatable across years in a songbird. Animal Behaviour doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.020
Zipple MN, Nowicki S, Searcy WA & Peters S. 2019. Full life course analysis of bird song reveals maturation and senescence of highly repeatable song characteristics. Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/arz146
Caves EM, Nowicki S & Johnsen S. 2019. Von Uexkull revisited: Addressing human biases in the study of animal perception. Integrative and Comparative Biology doi:10.1093/icb/icz073
Searcy WA, Ocampo D. & Nowicki S. 2019. Constraints on song type matching in a songbird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73: 102. doi:10.1007/s00265-019-2708-6
Zipple MN, Caves EM, Green PA, Peters S, Johnsen S & Nowicki S. 2019. Categorical perception across non-signaling versus signaling color ranges in a songbird. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 286: 20190524. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.0524
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2019. Birdsong learning, avian cognition, and the evolution of language. Anim. Behav. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.01.015
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2019. Signal reliability and intraspecific deception. In: Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, 2nd Edition. Choe, J.C. (ed.), vol. 1, pp. 589-597. Elsevier, Academic Press.
Caves EM, Green PA, Zipple MN, Peters S, Johnsen S & Nowicki S. 2018. Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird. Nature doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0377-7
Lachlan RF, Ratmann O & Nowicki S. 2018. Cultural conformity generates extremely stable traditions in bird song. Nature Communications 9: 2417 doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04728-1
Sewall KB, Anderson RC, Soha JA, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2018. Early life conditions that impact song learning in male zebra finches also impact neural and behavioral responses to song in females. Dev. Neurobiol. doi:10.1002/dneu.22600
Liu IA, Soha JA & Nowicki S. 2018. Song type matching and vocal performance in territorial signalling by male swamp sparrows. Anim. Behav. 139: 117-125.
DuBois AL, Nowicki S, Peters S, Rivera-Cáceres KD & Searcy WA. 2018. Song is not a reliable signal of general cognitive ability in a songbird. Anim. Behav. 137: 205-213.
Niederhauser JM, DuBois AL, Searcy WA, Nowicki S & Anderson RC. 2018. A test of the eavesdropping avoidance hypothesis as an explanation for the structure of low-amplitude aggressive signals in the song sparrow. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72: article 47.
Anderson RC, Searcy WA, Peters S, Hughes M, DuBois AL & Nowicki S. 2017. Song learning and cognitive ability are not consistently related in a songbird. Animal Cognition 20: 309-320.
Peters S & Nowicki S. 2017. Overproduction and attrition: the fates of songs memorized during song learning in songbirds. Anim. Behav. 124: 255-261.
DuBois AL, Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2016. A test for repertoire matching in eastern song sparrows. J. Avian Biol. 47: 146-152.
Klofstad CA, Nowicki S & Anderson RC. 2016. How voice pitch influences our choice of leaders. American Scientist 104 (Sept-Oct issue).
Soha JA & Peters S. 2015. Vocal learning in songbirds and humans: A retrospective in honor of Peter Marler. Ethology 121: 933-945.
Klofstad CA, Anderson RC & Nowicki S. 2015. Perceptions of competence, strength, and age influence voters to select leaders with lower-pitched voices. PLOS ONE doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133779
Liu IA, Johndrow JE, Abe J, Lupold S, Yasukawa K, Westneat DF & Nowicki S. 2015. Genetic diversity does not explain variation in extra-pair paternity in multiple populations of a songbird. J. Evol. Biol. 28: 1156-1169.
Akcay C, Anderson RC, Nowicki S, Beecher MD & Searcy WA. 2015. Quiet threats: soft song as an aggressive signal in birds. Anim. Behav. 105: 267-274.
Lachlan RF & Nowicki S. 2015. Context-dependent categorical perception in a songbird. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 112: 1892-1897.
Lachlan RF, Anderson RC, Peters S, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2014. Typical versions of learned swamp sparrow song types are more effective signals than are less typical versions. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 281: 20140252.
Peters S, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2014. Developmental stress, song-learning, and cognition. Integrative and Comparative Biology 54: 555-567.
Searcy WA, Akcay C, Nowicki S & Beecher MD. 2014. Aggressive signaling in Song Sparrows and other songbirds. In: M. Naguib et al. (Eds.) Advances in the Study of Behavior 46: 89-125. Academic Press: Burlington.
Anderson RC, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2014. Effects of early auditory experience on the development of local song preference in female swamp sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 437-447.
Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2014. The evolution of vocal learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28: 48-53.
Searcy WA, Sewall KB, Soha JA, Nowicki S & Peters S. 2014. Song-type sharing in a population of Song Sparrows in the eastern United States. J. Field Ornith. 85: 206-212.
Searcy WA, DuBois AL, Rivera-Cáceres K & Nowicki S. 2013. A test of a hierarchical signalling model in song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 86: 309-315.
Sewall KB, Soha JA, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2013. Potential trade-off between vocal ornamentation and spatial ability in a songbird. Biology Letters 9: 20130344.
Anderson RC, DuBois AL, Piech DK, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2013. Male response to an aggressive visual signal, the wing-wave display, in swamp sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 593-600.
Searcy WA, Anderson RC, Ballentine B & Nowicki S. 2013. Limits to reliability in avian aggressive signals. Behaviour 150: 1129-1145.
Lachlan RF & Nowicki S. 2012. How reliable is song learning accuracy as a signal of male early condition? American Naturalist 180: 751-761.
Peters S, Derryberry EP & Nowicki S. 2012. Songbirds learn songs least degraded by environmental transmission. Biology Letters 8: 736-739.
Anderson RC, Hughes M, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2012. The receiver-dependent cost of soft song – a signal of aggressive intent in songbirds. Anim. Behav. 83: 1443-1448.
Prather JF, Peters S, Mooney R & Nowicki S. 2012. Sensory constraints on birdsong syntax: neural responses to swamp sparrow songs with accelerated trill rates. Anim. Behav. 83: 1411-1420.
Boogert N, Anderson RC, Peters S, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2011. Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour-reaching, but not with other cognitive measures. Anim. Behav. 81: 1209-1216.
DuBois A, Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2011. Discrimination of vocal performance by male swamp sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 717-726.
Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2011. Are better singers smarter? Behav. Ecol. 22: 10-11.
Prather JF, Peters S, Nowicki S & Mooney R. 2010. Persistent representation of juvenile experience in the adult songbird brain. J. Neurosci. 30: 10586-10598.
Searcy WA, Peters S, Kipper S & Nowicki S. 2010. Female response to song reflects male developmental history in swamp sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 1343-1349.
DuBois A, Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2009. Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context. Biology Letters 5: 163-165.
Prather JF, Nowicki S, Anderson RC, Peters S & Mooney R. 2009. Neural correlates of categorical perception in learned vocal communication. Nature Neuroscience 12: 121-128.
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2009. Consequences of brain development for sexual signalling in songbirds. In: Dukas, R & J. Ratcliffe (eds.) Cognitive Ecology II, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 71-87.
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2009. Sexual selection and the evolution of animal signals. In: Larry R. Squire (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, vol. 8, pp. 769-776, Academic Press: Oxford.
Anderson RC, Searcy WA, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2008. Soft song in song sparrows: acoustic structure and implications for signal function. Ethology 114: 662-676.
Anderson RC, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2008. Testing the function of song matching in birds: responses of eastern male song sparrows Melospiza melodia to partial song matching. Behaviour 154: 347-363.
Ballentine B, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2008. Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp sparrows. Anim. Behav. 75: 693-703.
Nowicki S. 2008, 2012. Biology. Holt-McDougal (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt): Austin, TX.
Prather JF, Peters S, Nowicki S & Mooney R. 2008. Precise auditory-motor mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication. Nature 451: 305-310.
Searcy WA, Anderson RC & Nowicki S. 2008. Is bird song a reliable signal of aggressive intent? A reply. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1213-1216.
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2008. Bird song and the problem of signal reliability. Amer. Scientist 96: 114-121.
Anderson RC, Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2007. Soft song in song sparrows: response of males and females to an enigmatic signal. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1267-1274.
Hughes M, Anderson RC, Searcy WA, Bottensek LM & Nowicki S. 2007. Song type sharing and territory tenure in eastern song sparrows: implications for the evolution of song repertoires. Anim. Behav. 73: 701-710.
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2006. Signal interception and the use of soft song in aggressive interactions. Ethology 112: 865-872.
Searcy WA, Anderson RC & Nowicki S. 2006. Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. l60: 234-241.
Anderson RC, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2005. Partial song matching in an eastern population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) . Anim. Behav. 69: 189-196.
Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2005. Adaptive priorities in brain development: Theoretical comment on Pravosudov (2005). Behav. Neurosci. 119: 1415-1418.
Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2005. Song and mate choice in birds: How the development of behavior helps us understand function. Auk 122: 1-14.
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
Ballentine B, Hyman J & Nowicki S. 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol. 15: 163-168.
Hyman J, Hughes M, Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2004. Individual variation in the strength of territory defense in song sparrows: correlates of age, territory tenure, and neighbor aggressiveness. Behaviour 141: 15-27.
Nowicki S. 2004. Biology: The Science of Life. The Teaching Company: Chantilly, VA.
Nowicki S & Searcy WA. 2004. Song function and the evolution of female preferences: Why birds sing and why brains matter. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1016: 704-723.
Podos J & Nowicki S. 2004. Beaks, adaptation, and vocal evolution in Darwin's finches. BioScience 54: 501-510.
Podos J & Nowicki S. 2004. Performance limits on birdsong production. In: Marler, P & H. Slabbekoorn (Eds.) Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong, pp. 318-341. Elsevier/Academic Press: New York.
Podos J, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2004. Calibration of song learning targets during vocal ontogeny in swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana). Anim. Behav. 68: 929-940.
Searcy WA, Peters S & Nowicki S. 2004. Effects of early nutrition on growth rate and adult size in song sparrows. J. Avian Biol. 35: 269-279.
Searcy WA, Nowicki S & Peters S. 2003. Phonology and dialect discrimination in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Ethology 109: 23-35.
Nowicki S, Searcy WA & Peters S. 2002. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the "nutritional stress hypothesis." J. Comp Physiol. A 188: 1003-1014.
Nowicki S, Searcy WA & Peters S. 2002. Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1949-1954.
Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Krueger T & Hughes M. 2002. Individual variation in response to simulated territorial challenge among territory-holding song sparrows. J. Avian Biol. 33: 253-259.
Searcy WA, Nowicki S, Hughes M & Peters S. 2002. Geographic song discrimination in relation to dispersal distances in song sparrows. Amer. Natur. 159: 221-230.
Hoese WJ & Nowicki S. 2001. Using "the organism" as a conceptual focus in an introductory biology course. Amer. Biol. Teacher 63: 176-182.
Mooney R, Hoese WJ & Nowicki S. 2001. Auditory representation of the vocal repertoire in a songbird with multiple song types. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12798-12783.
Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Hughes M & Podos J. 2001. The evolution of bird song: male and female response to song innovation in swamp sparrows. Anim. Behav. 62: 1189-1195.
Hoese WJ, Podos J, Boetticher NC & Nowicki S. 2000. Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. J. Exp. Biol. 203: 1845-1855.
Nowicki S, Hasselquist D, Bensch S & Peters S. 2000. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2419-2424.
Peters S, Searcy WA, Beecher MD & Nowicki S. 2000. Geographic variation in the organization of song sparrow repertoires. Auk 117: 936-942.
Podos J & Nowicki S. 2000. Mechanical limits and the evolution of vocalizations in birds. In: Maria Alice dos Santos Alves, et al. (Eds.) A Ornithologia no Brasil: Pesquisa Atual e Perspectivas, do Congresso Brasileiro de Ornitologia, pp. 251-271. EdUERJ: Rio de Janiero.
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 2000. Male-male competition and female choice in the evolution of vocal signaling. In: Y. Espmark, T. Amundsen & G. Rosenqvist (Eds.) Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication, pp. 301-315. Tapir Academic Press: Trondheim.
Searcy WA, Nowicki S & Hogan C. 2000. Song type variants and aggressive context. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48: 358-363.
Nowicki S, Peters S, Searcy WA & Clayton C. 1999. The development of within-song type variation in song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 57: 1257-1264.
Podos J, Nowicki S & Peters S. 1999. Permissiveness in vocal syntax learning in the swamp sparrow. Anim. Behav. 58: 93-103.
Searcy WA & Nowicki S. 1999. Functions of song variation in song sparrows. In: M. Konishi & M. Hauser (eds.) The Design of Animal Communication, pp. 577-595. MIT Press: New York.
Searcy WA, Nowicki S & Peters S. 1999. Song types as fundamental units in vocal repertoires. Anim. Behav. 58: 37-44.
Nowicki S, Peters S & Podos J. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Amer. Zool. 38: 179-190.
Nowicki S, Searcy WA & Hughes M. 1998. The territory defense function of song in song sparrows: a test with the speaker occupation design. Behaviour 135: 615-628.
Hughes M, Nowicki S, Searcy WA & Peters S. 1998. Song type sharing in song sparrows: Implications for repertoire function and song learning. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 437-446.
Hughes M, Nowicki S & Lohr B. 1998. Call learning in black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus): The role of experience in the development of "chick-a-dee" calls. Ethology 104: 232-249.
Erickson CJ, Nowicki S, Dollar L & Goehring N. 1998. Percussive foraging: Stimuli for prey location by aye-ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis). Int. J. Primatol. 19: 111-122.
Gaunt AS & Nowicki S. 1998. Birdsong: acoustics and physiology revisited. In: Hopp, S. L. M. J. Owren & C. S. Evans (eds.), Animal Acoustic Communication. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 291-321.
Searcy WA, Hughes M & Nowicki S. 1997. The response of male and female song sparrows to geographic variation in song. Condor 99: 651-657.
Nowicki S. 1997. Bird acoustics. In: M. J. Crocker (ed.) Encyclopedia of Acoustics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chapter 150, pp. 1813-1817.
Peters S & Nowicki S. 1996. Development of tonal quality in birdsong: Further evidence from song sparrows. Ethology 102: 323-335.
Strote J & Nowicki S. 1996. Responses to songs with altered tonal quality by adult song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Behaviour 130: 1-15.
Podos J, Shearer JK, Peters S & Nowicki S. 1995. Ontogeny of vocal tract movements during song production in song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 50: 1287-1296.
Searcy WA, Podos J, Peters S & Nowicki S. 1995. Discrimination of song types and variants in song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 49: 1219-1226.
Lohr B, Weisman R & Nowicki S. 1994. The role of pitch cues in song recognition by Carolina chickadees (Parus carolinensis). Behaviour 130: 1-15.
Nowicki S, Podos J & Valdés F. 1994. Temporal patterning of within-song type and between-song type variation in song repertoires. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34: 329-335.
Nowicki S & Podos J. 1993. Complexity, coupling and contingency in birdsong. In: Perspectives in Ethology, vol.10 (P.P.G. Bateson, P. Klopfer & N. Thompson, eds.), pp. 159-186, Plenum Press, New York.
Westneat MW, Long, Jr. JH, Hoese W & Nowicki S. 1993. Kinematics of birdsong: Functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows. J. Exp. Biol. 182: 147-171.
Jacobs M, Nowacek DP, Cannon G, Nowicki S & Forward RB. 1993. Seasonal changes in vocalizations during behavior of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. Estuaries 16: 241-246.
Nowicki S, Westneat M & Hoese W. 1992. Birdsong: Motor function and the evolution of communication. Seminars in Neurosci. 4: 385-390.
Nowicki S, Marler P, Maynard A & Peters S. 1992. Is the tonal quality of birdsong learned? Evidence from song sparrows. Ethology 90: 225-235.
Peters S, Marler P & Nowicki S. 1992. Song sparrows learn from limited exposure to song models. Condor 94: 1016-1019.
Podos J, Peters S, Rudnicky T, Marler P & Nowicki S. 1992. The organization of song repertoires in song sparrows: Themes and variations. Ethology 90: 89-106.
Nowicki S, Hughes M & Marler P. 1991. Flight songs of swamp sparrows: Alternative phonology of an alternative song category. Condor 93: 1-11.
Lohr B, Nowicki S & Weisman R. 1991. Pitch production in Carolina chickadee songs. Condor 93: 197-199.
Nowicki S & Nelson DA. 1990. Defining natural categories in acoustic signals: Comparison of three methods applied to 'chick-a-dee' call notes. Ethology 86: 89-101.
Ball GF & Nowicki S. 1990. Assessment of song quality in photorefractory and photosensitive song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 40: 986-987.
Nowicki S. & Ball GF. 1989. Testosterone induction of song in photosensitive and photorefractory male sparrows. Horm. and Behav. 23: 514-525.
Nowicki S. Mitani JC, Nelson DA & Marler P. 1989. The communicative significance of tonality in birdsong: Responses to songs produced in helium. Bioacoustics 2: 35-46.
Nowicki S. 1989. Vocal plasticity in captive black-capped chickadees: The acoustic basis and rate of call convergence. Anim. Behav. 37: 64-73.
Nowicki S & Marler P. 1988. How do birds sing? Music Perception 5: 391-426.
Nowicki S. 1987. Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: evidence from birdsongs in a helium atmosphere. Nature 325: 53-55.
Nowicki S & Capranica RR. 1986. Bilateral syringeal coupling during phonation of a songbird. J. Neuroscience 6: 3595-3610.
Nowicki S & Capranica RR. 1986. Bilateral syringeal interaction in the vocal production of an oscine bird sound. Science 231: 1297-1299.
Nowicki S. 1985. Spider. In: McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology (S.P. Parker, editor-in-chief), pp. 410-412, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Nowicki S. 1984. A question of identity: the call of the black-capped chickadee. Living Bird Quart. 3(1) : 30.
Nowicki S. 1983. Flock-specific recognition of chickadee calls. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 317-320.
Eisner T & Nowicki S. 1983. Spider web protection through visual advertisement: The role of the "stabilimentum." Science 219: 185-187.
Nowicki S & Eisner T. 1983. Predatory capture of bombardier beetles by a tabanid fly larva. Psyche 90: 119-122.
Jackman R, Nowicki S, Aneshansley DJ & Eisner T. 1983. Predatory capture of toads by fly larvae. Science 222: 515-516.
Jefson M, Meinwald J, Nowicki S, Hicks K & Eisner T. 1983. Chemical defense of a rove beetle (Creophilus maxillosus). J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 159-180.
Jain SC, Nowicki S, Eisner T & Meinwald J. 1982. Insect repellents for vetiver oil: Zizanal and epizizanal. Tetr. Letters 23: 4639-4642.
Mammen DL & Nowicki S. 1981. Individual differences and within-flock convergence in chickadee calls. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 179-186.
Eisner T, Nowicki S, Goetz M & Meinwald J. 1980. Red cochineal dye (Carminic acid): Its role in nature. Science 208: 1038-1040.
Nowicki S & Armitage KB. 1979. Behavior of juvenile yellow-bellied marmots: Play and social integration. Z. Tierpsychol. 51: 85-105.